Pricing that helps the right work start the right way.
Senior engineering and design only. No account managers, no junior throughput, and no vague commercial shape. The point of this page is to make the next step more obvious, not just show three price tags.
Pricing designed to make the next step clearer.
Three practical ways to work with V3CT0R. All are built around senior delivery, tighter scope control, and getting something commercially useful moving early.
No hand-off layer between sales, design, and engineering. The people shaping the work stay close to delivery.
Most projects start with a smaller, useful first phase rather than forcing certainty too early.
The goal is not to over-specify. It is to choose the structure that gives the work the best chance of moving properly.
Not every enquiry needs to start at £4.5k.
If the work is blocked, unclear, or needs an initial technical read, these smaller offers give us a useful way to start without pretending the full build scope is obvious on day one.
Launch Readiness Audit
A focused technical review for founders who need to know what could break before launch.
MVP Rescue Sprint
Hands-on investigation and fixes for blocked Lovable, Supabase, AI-generated, or near-launch MVPs.
SEO Growth Foundation
Technical SEO, page structure, and practical search improvements for small teams building organic visibility.
Focused weekly cycles for design, prototyping or scoped builds.
Diagnostics, product direction, scoped UX work, MVP rescue, and tight technical pushes that need fast senior attention.
- Rapid prototyping
- UX strategy & UI design
- Weekly delivery cycle
- Async by default
A dedicated cross-functional team owning your product roadmap.
MVP builds, deeper product momentum, backend-heavy delivery, and systems work that needs several layers moving together.
- Full-stack development
- API & database architecture
- Design + engineering paired
- Priority support channel
Bespoke engagements for AI, parsers and infrastructure rebuilds.
Projects with unusual technical shape, deeper backend risk, larger migrations, or commercial structures that do not fit a standard cadence.
- Bespoke LLM solutions
- Large-scale data migrations
- Legacy infrastructure audit
- Equity / venture options
You need a focused week for diagnosis, design direction, prototyping, or a tightly scoped technical push without committing to a full monthly stream.
You need real product momentum across UX, backend, architecture, and implementation, and want the same senior team carrying the work through in sequence.
The work is unusual, technical, or high-risk enough that it needs a dedicated scope rather than fitting cleanly into a weekly or monthly package.
What the pricing is trying to optimise for.
If you are unsure where to start.
Most blocked or ambiguous work should start smaller. Most multi-layered product or systems work should move into the build stream once the first useful scope is clear.
Common pricing questions.
Do projects always start on one of these packages?
Not always, but most work maps well to one of them. The point is to make the first step clearer and lower risk, not force every engagement into the same shape.
Can a sprint roll into a build?
Yes. That is often the cleanest path when the first week is used to clarify scope, fix blockers, or shape the next useful delivery phase.
What if the scope is still vague?
That is usually a sign the first step should be a sprint or smaller diagnostic pass. We would rather tighten the shape of the work first than pretend the full scope is already obvious.
Are these fixed quotes or starting structures?
They are engagement structures and starting price points. Final commercial shape still depends on system depth, timeline pressure, integrations, and how much uncertainty is in the work.
Have a system that needs building?
Tell us about it. First response within 4 business hours.